Posts by AMI

    yes but the tags are required by the google bot, so there is no chance to use your extension in this case :)

    its doesnt matter if inline or as file, google just doesnt recognize it, it needs the full code with tags in the given order

    are you using structured data ? please give it a try by yourself then you will see,

    btw this topic shhould be moved to seo, right ?

    The result in a few words: YooTheme would love to see more user input.

    Hm, but what does he exactly mean ? For me as a user i dont see many ways to give them any input. I already told others about pagekit and wrote about my experiences with pk, but what what else can i do as a non-dev ?

    i strongly recoomend you to use Roman`s assets extension.

    you can override and have different css (paddings for example) on different pages , thats exactly what i did

    I will be off for holidays soon and at the place where we stay there isnt any network, wifi, 3G or whatever. In short words: I am lost !

    Would it be possible to setup a pagekit installation that runs locally on my computer (mamp server) that works without any network connection ?

    Well then it is pretty easy to do so if you install roman's asset extension for pagekit!

    Just install it and create a new css asset with following content, that you probably need to adjust slightly:

    Well now each element that is tagged as .zoom-box should be scaled on mouse over.

    i stripped down the code a little bit, this works perfect fo me

    my first intention was that the cookie decline button leads the user to a static "sorry, good bye" page

    maybe this scenario will become real in the future, who knows ;)

    yes, deleting browsercache was the solution !

    greetings to Avenwedde, just realized that you live in the neighbourhood :)

    and thanks for the example, for some reasons the decline button is not showing up

    i deleted romans extensin first, then intalled yours, it gave a mismatch error but installed itself, i deleted cache and treid again, nope

    this is also complicated stuff, right ?

    i just thougt by giving the user the option to decline all cookies, i am on the safe side,

    i dont need any information from users anyway